TY - JOUR T1 - Molecular diagnosis of symptomatic toxoplasmosis: a 9-year retrospective and prospective study in a referral laboratory in São Paulo, Brazil JO - The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases T2 - AU - Camilo,Lilian Muniz AU - Pereira-Chioccola,Vera Lucia AU - Gava,Ricardo AU - Meira-Strejevitch,Cristina da Silva AU - Vidal,Jose Ernesto AU - Brandão de Mattos,Cinara Cássia AU - Frederico,Fábio Batista AU - De Mattos,Luiz Carlos AU - Spegiorin,Lígia Cosentino Junqueira Franco SN - 14138670 M3 - 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.07.003 DO - 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.07.003 UR - https://www.bjid.org.br/en-molecular-diagnosis-symptomatic-toxoplasmosis-9-year-articulo-S1413867017304853 AB - Symptomatic forms of toxoplasmosis are a serious public health problem and occur in around 10–20% of the infected people. Aiming to improve the molecular diagnosis of symptomatic toxoplasmosis in Brazilian patients, this study evaluated the performance of real time PCR testing two primer sets (B1 and REP-529) in detecting Toxoplasma gondii DNA. The methodology was assayed in 807 clinical samples with known clinical diagnosis, ELISA, and conventional PCR results in a 9-year period. All samples were from patients with clinical suspicion of several features of toxoplasmosis. According to the minimum detection limit curve (in CT), REP-529 had greater sensitivity to detect T. gondii DNA than B1. Both primer sets were retrospectively evaluated using 515 DNA from different clinical samples. The 122 patients without toxoplasmosis provided high specificity (REP-529, 99.2% and B1, 100%). From the 393 samples with positive ELISA, 146 had clinical diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and positive conventional PCR. REP-529 and B1 sensitivities were 95.9% and 83.6%, respectively. Comparison of REP-529 and B1 performances was further analyzed prospectively in 292 samples. Thus, from a total of 807 DNA analyzed, 217 (26.89%) had positive PCR with, at least one primer set and symptomatic toxoplasmosis confirmed by clinical diagnosis. REP-529 was positive in 97.23%, whereas B1 amplified only 78.80%. After comparing several samples in a Brazilian referral laboratory, this study concluded that REP-529 primer set had better performance than B1 one. These observations were based after using cases with defined clinical diagnosis, ELISA, and conventional PCR. ER -