Journal Information
Vol. 15. Issue 3.
Pages 245-248 (May - June 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 15. Issue 3.
Pages 245-248 (May - June 2011)
Open Access
Prevalence and factors associated with darunavir resistance mutations in multi-experienced HIV-1-infected patients failing other protease inhibitors in a referral teaching center in Brazil
Visits
2597
Jose E. Vidal1,
Corresponding author
josevibe@gmail.com

Rua Frei Caneca 557 01307-001, São Paulo, Brazil, Phone/Fax: 55 11 31205290.
, Angela C. Freitas2, Alice T.W. Song2, Silvia V. Campos2, Mirian Dalben3, Adrian V. Hernandez4
1 AIDS Clinic, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
2 AIDS Clinic, USP, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
3 AIDS Clinic, USP, School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
4 Health Outcomes and Clinical Epidemiology, Dept. of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract

Information about resistance profile of darunavir (DRV) is scarce in Brazil. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of DRV resistance mutations in patients failing protease inhibitors (PI) and to identify factors associated with having more DRV resistance mutations. All HIV-infected patients failing PI-based regimens with genotyping performed between 2007 and 2008 in a referral teaching center in São Paulo, Brazil, were included. DRV-specific resistance mutations listed by December 2008 IAS-USA panel update were considered. Two Poisson regression models were constructed to assess factors related to the presence of more DRV resistance mutations. A total of 171 HIV-infected patients with available genotyping were included. The number of patients with lopinavir, saquinavir, and amprenavir used in previous regimen were 130 (76%), 83 (49%), and 35 (20%), respectively. The prevalence of major DRV resistance mutations was 50V: 5%; 54M: 1%; 76V: 4%; 84V: 15%. For minor mutations, the rates were 11I: 3%; 32I: 7%; 33F: 23%; 47V: 6%; 54L: 6%; 74P: 3%; 89V: 6%. Only 11 (6%) of the genotypes had ≥ 3 DRV resistance mutations. In the clinical model, time of HIV infection of > 10 years and use of amprenavir were independently associated with having more DRV resistance mutations. In the genotyping-based model, only total number of PI resistance mutations was associated with our outcome. In conclusion, the prevalence of DRV mutations was low. Time of HIV infection, use of amprenavir and total number of PI resistance mutations were associated with having more DRV mutations.

Keywords:
antiretroviral therapy
highly active
HIV protease inhibitors
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Brazil
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
J. Gallant.
Approach to the treatment-experienced patient.
Infect Dis Clin N Am, 21 (2007), pp. 85-102
[2.]
B. Clotet, N. Bellos, J.M. Molina, et al.
Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir at week 48 in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection in POWER 1 and 2: a pooled subgroup analysis of data from two randomised trials.
Lancet, 369 (2007), pp. 1169-1178
[3.]
Accessed on March 3, 2009.
[4.]
www.iasusa.org. Accessed on March 3, 2009.
[5.]
S. De Meyer, I. Dierynck, E. Lathouwers, et al.
Phenotipic and genotypic determinants of resistance to darunavir: analysis of data from treatment-experienced patients in POWER 1, 2, 3, and DUET-1 and DUET-2.
Antiviral Therapy, 13 (2008), pp. A33
[6.]
S. De Meyer, I. Dierynck, E. Lathouwers, et al.
Identification of mutations predictive of a diminished response to darunavir/ritonavir: Analysis of data from treatment-experienced patients in POWER 1, 2, 3 and DUET-1 and 2.
6th European HIV Drug Resistance Workshop,
[7.]
E. Poveda, C. de Mendoza, L. Martin-Carbonero, et al.
Prevalence of darunavir resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected patients failing other protease inhibitors.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 60 (2007), pp. 885-888
[8.]
Y. Mitsuya, T.F. Liu, S.Y. Rhee, W.J. Fessel, R.W. Shafer.
Prevalence of darunavir resistance-associated mutations: patterns of occurrence and association with past treatment.
J Infect Dis, 196 (2007), pp. 1177-1179
[9.]
G. Picchio, T. Vangeneugden, B. Van Baelen, et al.
Prior utilization or resistance to amprenavir at screening has minimal effect on the 48-week response to darunavir/r in the POWER 1, 2, and 3 studies.
14th Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infections,
[10.]
A. Di Biagio, R. Rosso, B. Bruzzone, et al.
Difference evidence of key amprenavir resistance mutations on the efficacy of darunavir.
[11.]
S.Y. Rhee, J. Taylor, W.J. Fessel, et al.
HIV-1 Protease mutations and protease inhibitor cross-resistance.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 54 (2010), pp. 4253-4261
[12.]
N. Parkin, E. Stawiski, C. Chappey, E. Coakley.
Darunavir/amprenavir cross-resistance in clinical samples submitted for phenotype/genotype combination resistance testing.
14th Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infections,
Copyright © 2011. Elsevier Editora Ltda.. All rights reserved
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools