Suggestions
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
691
Full text access

ADHERENCE TO HEALTH CARE–ASSOCIATED INFECTION PREVENTION MEASURES IN AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT OF A TERTIARY TEACHING HOSPITAL AND ITS IMPACT ON INFECTION AND COLONIZATION DENSITIES BY MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT MICROORGANISMS

Visits
712
Luciana de Oliveira Matias
Corresponding author
luciana.matias@huhsp.org.br

Corresponding author:
, Renata da Rocha Flud, Sandra Gomes de Barros Houly, Letícia Sandre Vendrame Saes, Michelle Oliveira Max, Diego Cassola Pronunciato, Felipe Alberto Lei, Samily Aquino de Sá Oliveira, Caio de Castro Novais, Karen de Castro Baubab, Josiane Trevisol Leal, Diogo Boldim Ferreira, Eduardo Alexandrino Medeiros
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S1

XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025

More info
Introduction

Hand hygiene and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) are among the recommended measures to prevent the spread of antimicrobial multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDR) in health services. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a multimodal intervention on hand hygiene practices, PPE use by health professionals, HAI density, and patient colonization by MDR.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study conducted in an adult ICU at a hospital in São Paulo, developed over three periods: pre-intervention (08/01–10/31/2023), multimodal intervention (11/01/2023–04/30/2024), and post-intervention (05/01–10/31/2024). In the first period, professionals maintained their usual hand hygiene and PPE practices for MDR contact precautions. During the intervention, trainings were conducted; educational videos and leaflets were provided; supplies for hand hygiene were made available (one bottle of alcohol gel per bed); reminder posters were placed in the unit; and feedback on evaluation results was given. In the post period, the implemented measures were maintained. Hand hygiene was considered “compliant” when performed according to the WHO’s 5 moments and without wearing jewelry/adornments. PPE use was considered “compliant” when the correct sequence of donning and/or doffing was observed. HAIs were reported according to ANVISA criteria. To identify patients colonized with MDR, rectal swabs were collected upon ICU admission and weekly until discharge. ICU-acquired colonization was defined as a positive culture from the 3rd day of ICU stay onward.

Results

A total of 1,188 hand hygiene evaluations were performed; mean adherence by study period was 50%, 52.67%, and 66.5% (p > 0.05), respectively. Regarding PPE use, 356 observations were made; means were 32.33%, 46.17%, and 45.17% (p = NS). Mean HAI densities due to MDR per 1,000 patient-days were 2.23, 5.45, and 3.83 (p = NS). Mean MDR colonization densities per 1,000 patient-days were 19.5, 11.43, and 8.03 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The multimodal intervention contributed to better professional practices related to HAI prevention measures and had a significant impact on reducing MDR colonization density.

Keywords:
Intensive Care Units
Multidrug Resistance
Personal Protective Equipment
Hand Hygiene
Health Care–Associated Infection
PDF
Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools