Suggestions
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
282
Full text access

ALL UNDER CONTROL? PERSISTENT LOW-LEVEL VIREMIA AND EARLY FAILURE AS WARNING SIGNS IN HIV THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT IN A BRAZILIAN COHORT

Visits
674
Pietra Vivian Stanickia,b,
Corresponding author
pietra.stanicki@unesp.br

Corresponding author.
, Karen Ingrid Tascaa,b, William Ryan Zimmermana,b, Daniel Corrêa Ishidaa,b, Miguel Marques Mantovania,b, Gabriele Justino Paniagoa,b, Gustavo Gramoline Pacheco da Cunhaa,b, Lara Munhoz Mathiasa,b, Luca Tomazinho Marquesa,b, Pedro Moryta Lopesa,b, Rafael Vieira Szogyenyia,b, Giovani Gomes Belloa,b, Alexandre Naime Barbosaa,b
a Departamento de Infectologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
b Georgetown University, Washington, USA
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S1

XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025

More info
Introduction

Sustained viral suppression (VL < 50 copies/mL) is the main target of ART, essential for immune restoration, prevention of transmission, and normalization of survival among people living with HIV (PLWH). However, some individuals maintain detectable VL between 50–199 copies/mL, characterizing persistent low-level viremia (LLV). Although LLV does not constitute classic virologic failure, it has been associated with systemic inflammation, cardiovascular risk, and emergence of resistance mutations. This study estimated the prevalence of LLV and early therapeutic failure (ETF), as well as possible associations with ART regimens, in a real-life cohort from a national reference center.

Methods

Longitudinal analysis of a cohort of 1,050 PLWH with ≥ 4 semiannual VL measurements between the first semester of 2023 and the second semester of 2024, with recorded ART regimen. LLV was defined as ≥ 2 consecutive VLs between 50–199 copies/mL; ETF as VL between 200–499 copies/mL. Prevalences and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using the Wilson method.

Results

Among the 1,050 individuals, 57 (5.43%) had persistent residual viremia. Of these, 25 met criteria for LLV (2.38%; 95% CI: 1.62–3.49) and 32 for ETF (3.05%; 95% CI: 2.17–4.27). The LLV:ETF ratio was 4:5. Among those with detectable VL, 43.9% had LLV and 56.1% ETF, suggesting a risk of early progression to sustained virologic failure. No statistically significant association was identified between occurrence of LLV/ETF and type of ART regimen, regardless of whether regimens were simplified two-drug (2D) regimens, traditional three-drug (3D) regimens, or regimens based on integrase inhibitors (INSTI) or protease inhibitors (PI).

Conclusion

The prevalence of LLV in this cohort (2.38%) was lower than that reported in large international cohorts: 3.5% in a US–Europe consortium and 9.9% in a European study defining LLV as two consecutive VLs between 51–199 copies/mL after 12 months of ART. These data reinforce the effectiveness of current regimens; however, residual viremia, even at low levels, requires close monitoring. Continuous surveillance – emphasizing adherence, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic adjustments – is an essential component of management. Detectable VL in two consecutive semesters, even at low levels, may represent a critical window for intervention, especially in contexts of irregular adherence or inflammatory comorbidities.

Keywords:
HIV
Low-level viremia
Therapeutic failure
Simplification
Viral load
PDF
Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools