Suggestions
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
756
Full text access

IMPACT OF EMERGENCY ACTIONS ON REDUCING THE INCIDENCE DENSITY OF PRIMARY BLOODSTREAM INFECTION ASSOCIATED WITH CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER IN AN ONCOLOGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

Visits
509
Débora de Oliveira Lopes
Corresponding author
debora.l@hc.fm.usp.br

Corresponding author:
, Adriana S. G. Kono Magri, Valdirene Santos Folli Cabral, Marina Balbino Braga, Tânia Magalhães dos Santos, Luiz Dalfior Júnior, João Manoel Silva Júnior, Michely Fernandes Vieira, Vítor Falcão de Oliveira, Edson Abdala, Odeli Nicole Encinas Sejas
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S1

XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025

More info
Introduction/Objectives

Primary bloodstream infections associated with central venous catheters (CLABSI) represent serious adverse events in oncology patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs), contributing to increased morbidity, length of stay, and hospital costs. In June 2024, a marked increase in the incidence density (ID) of CLABSI was identified in a 34-bed oncological ICU. The objective of this study was to describe the extraordinary actions adopted and to evaluate their impact on reducing the infection rate.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study with retrospective analysis, conducted in a public quaternary oncology hospital. The intervention occurred between July and September 2024. Initially, a root cause analysis was conducted using the Ishikawa diagram. Subsequently, corrective measures were defined using the 5W2H tool and included: in-person training on catheter insertion and maintenance, daily bedside audits using checklists, intensified active surveillance, implementation of the central venous catheter maintenance bundle in the electronic medical record, technovigilance of vascular access devices, and feedback of indicators with a shared action plan. Intervention effectiveness was assessed by comparing the CLABSI incidence density (number of infections per 1,000 catheter-days) before and after the intervention, using a chi-square test for two Poisson rates. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.

Results

The CLABSI ID in June 2024 reached 10.8, a value well above the 2023 annual average (3.8). After the intervention, a progressive decline in incidence density was observed: July (5.8), August (5.5), and September (0.0) infections per 1,000 catheter-days (p = 0.005). Care audits demonstrated greater adherence to recommended practices, with immediate correction of nonconformities. The multidisciplinary approach fostered team engagement and contributed to the sustainability of the implemented actions.

Conclusion

The adoption of structured interventions based on root cause analysis and multidisciplinary strategies significantly reduced the ID of CLABSI in an oncological ICU. The sustained decline, together with improved adherence to safe practices, demonstrates the positive impact of educational actions, systematic audits, and proactive risk management. The results reinforce the importance of continuous surveillance and engagement of healthcare teams in infection prevention.

Keywords:
Catheter-Related Infections
Bloodstream Infection
Infection Control
Intensive Care Unit
Oncology
PDF
Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools