Research in context
Evidence before this study
We searched Embase, Global Health, and MEDLINE with the terms “HTLV-1” and “epidemiology” to identify all articles in any language published from inception to July, 2018, assessing the health effects of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type-1 (HTLV-1). While previous reviews of the health effects of HTLV-1 have focused on specific organ systems or disease states such as dermatological and neurological manifestations, HTLV-1-associated myelopathy or tropical spastic paraparesis, and adult T-cell leuekaemia-lymphoma (ATL), we found no comprehensive assessment of the scope and extent of morbidity associated with HTLV-1. We systematically reviewed the literature to address this gap.
Added value of study
We found in a meta-analysis that HTLV-1 infection is associated with an increased risk of death compared with those without HTLV-1 (relative risk 1·57, 95% CI 1·37–1·80). The risk is higher in younger age groups, possibly due to fewer competing causes of death. Our review highlighted a dearth of robust evidence of the morbidity associated with HTLV-1 that might explain this increased mortality. There is evidence of low to moderate quality showing that people with HTLV-1 have increased odds of developing seborrheic dermatitis; eczema; bronchitis, bronchiectasis, and bronchiolitis (analysed together); urinary tract infections; and lymphoma other than ATL. Evidence for associations between HTLV-1 and all other conditions studied was assessed to be very low quality.
Implications of all the available evidence
Our findings clearly show that people with HTLV-1 are at a higher risk of death than their HTLV-1-negative counterparts, but reasons for this are not well understood. There might be serious health effects of the virus that have not been sufficiently studied. Epidemiological studies are needed in this area, but are challenging because of the range of possible outcomes associated with the virus, difficulties in ascertaining time of acquisition and duration of infection, and the diversity of factors that might moderate the immunological response to the virus and need to be taken into account in study design. International collaboration to overcome these challenges and to design and implement studies that can compare outcomes across different settings and in different population groups is urgently needed.