Parasitology
Contribution of laboratory methods in diagnosing clinically suspected ocular toxoplasmosis in Brazilian patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.02.002Get rights and content

Abstract

This prospective study evaluated the value of laboratorial diagnosis in ocular toxoplasmosis analyzing peripheral blood samples from a group of Brazilian patients by immunologic and molecular methods. We analyzed blood samples from 184 immunocompetent patients with ocular disorders divided into 2 groups: Group I, composed of samples from 49 patients with ocular toxoplasmosis diagnosed by clinical features; Group II, samples from 135 patients with other ocular diseases. Samples were assayed by conventional polymerase chain reaction (cnPCR), real-time PCR (qPCR) for Toxoplasma gondii, indirect immunofluorescence reaction (IF), avidity test (crude tachyzoite lysate as antigen), and excreted–secreted tachyzoite proteins as antigen (ESA-ELISA). cnPCR and qPCR profiles were concordant in all samples. Positive PCR was shown in 40.8% of group I patients. The majority of the positive blood samples (75%) were taken from patients with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis scars, and the others (25%), from patients with retinal exudative lesions. Despite that 86 of the 135 patients from Group II had asymptomatic toxoplasmosis, all DNA blood samples had negative PCR. Concordant results were shown in the data obtained by serologic methods. Around 24% of the patients with ocular toxoplasmosis had high antibody titers determined by ESA-ELISA and IF. Anti-ESA antibodies are shown principally in patients with active infection. Collectively, these data demonstrate the presence of tachyzoites in the blood of patients with chronic infection, supporting the idea of recurrent disease. Circulating parasites in blood of immunocompetent individuals may be associated with the reactivation of the ocular disease.

Introduction

Toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis is the most common lesion caused by Toxoplasma gondii infection and may occur either immediately or long after the initial infection or in reactivation (Montoya and Remington, 1996, Vallochi et al., 2008). Rupture of dormant cysts in the retina can release viable parasites that induce necrosis and inflammation. Alternatively, retinochoroiditis might result from a hypersensitivity reaction triggered by unknown causes (Commodaro et al., 2009), resulting in irreversible damage to the retina involved, whose consequences may be severe visual morbidity (Remington et al., 2001). In addition, toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis has been reported as more severe in Brazil than in Europe (Gilbert et al., 2008).

Despite the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis is typically based on clinical analysis, the laboratorial tests normally can help the definitive diagnosis. The presence of anti–T. gondii IgG antibodies does not confirm the toxoplasmic etiology, but such antibodies can often persist at high titers for years after the acute infection, and a negative result generally discards the diagnosis (Ongkosuwito et al., 1999). T. gondii DNA has been identified in ocular tissue sections and vitreous fluid (Grigg et al., 2001, Montoya and Remington, 1996, Rothova et al., 2008).

To evaluate the value of the laboratorial diagnosis in ocular toxoplasmosis, this study analyzed peripheral blood samples from a group of Brazilian patients with ocular toxoplasmosis by immunologic and molecular methods.

Section snippets

Patients and clinical samples

This prospective study was conducted for 12 months (July 2009 to June 2010). We analyzed blood samples from 184 patients with ocular alterations admitted and treated at the Ophthalmology Outpatients Clinics from Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina–Hospital de Base, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. All patients were immunocompetent and were divided into 2 groups according to clinical data. Group I consisted of 49 patients with ocular toxoplasmosis including 38 with toxoplasmic

Results

This study evaluated the laboratorial diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis by analyzing peripheral blood samples from 184 Brazilian patients with ocular alterations. The tests included cnPCR, qPCR, IF, avidity test, and ESA-ELISA. The results of the immunologic and molecular tests are shown in Table 1. The results of molecular diagnosis (cnPCR and qPCR) were consistent in all samples. By the analysis of peripheral blood from the patients with ocular toxoplasmosis, both methods presented 40.8% (20)

Discussion

The evaluation of molecular diagnosis in ocular disease is usually performed in intraocular fluid samples, but the methods used for sample collection are invasive. On the other hand, PCR in peripheral blood samples has been successfully used for cerebral toxoplasmosis diagnosis (Colombo et al., 2005, Mesquita et al., 2010, Mesquita et al., 2010a). The great difference is that patients with cerebral toxoplasmosis generally are immunosuppressed and the parasites are relatively easy to determine

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Eveline Farias-Hesson for critical feedback and Jim Hesson of Academic English Solutions for revising the English.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

This study was supported by grants from i) FAPESP (Fundaçao de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil), Proc: 2008/09311-0, 2009/16723-6, and 2009/17540-2; ii) CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil), Proc: 301531/2009-9 and 473579/2009-0; iii) CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior); iv) BAP-FAMERP; and v) Biotecnology Research Institute (Auckland University of Technology).

View full text